Comments for cmpatrick.com http://cmpatrick.com Sun, 02 May 2010 19:51:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 Comment on Thoughts on Star Trek by Trevor Mierez http://cmpatrick.com/2009/05/12/moviereview-startrek/comment-page-1/#comment-424 Trevor Mierez Sun, 02 May 2010 19:51:55 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=144#comment-424 Hey! Just thought I'd chime in. I thoroughly was impressed by this article. Keep up the awesome effort. Hey! Just thought I’d chime in. I thoroughly was impressed by this article. Keep up the awesome effort.

]]> Comment on imperfect circles by Cecille Uddin http://cmpatrick.com/2009/03/21/imperfect-circles/comment-page-1/#comment-417 Cecille Uddin Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:59:37 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=104#comment-417 Merely want to say your article is impressive. The clarity in your post is simply impressive and i can assume you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the respectable work Merely want to say your article is impressive. The clarity in your post is simply impressive and i can assume you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the respectable work

]]> Comment on Thoughts on Star Trek by Eduardo http://cmpatrick.com/2009/05/12/moviereview-startrek/comment-page-1/#comment-416 Eduardo Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:48:34 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=144#comment-416 Men are born to succeed, not fail. Men are born to succeed, not fail.

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by Craig Michael Patrick http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Craig Michael Patrick Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:56:00 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-19 Thanks for your input. On a scale of ten, I'd probably only give it slightly higher than that for visual effects. But visual effects doesn't necessarily make for a good film. Interestingly, Alan Moore, the writer of the graphic novel, made certain his name was not affiliated with the movie. Thanks for your input. On a scale of ten, I’d probably only give it slightly higher than that for visual effects. But visual effects doesn’t necessarily make for a good film. Interestingly, Alan Moore, the writer of the graphic novel, made certain his name was not affiliated with the movie.

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by Kris http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Kris Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:54:45 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-18 I have seen watchmen and i was not impressed by the movie at all. There was alot of advertising in belgium around it but i would rate it 5.5/10. I have seen watchmen and i was not impressed by the movie at all. There was alot of advertising in belgium around it but i would rate it 5.5/10.

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by Craig Michael Patrick http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Craig Michael Patrick Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:49:24 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-10 Good point - you do get your money's worth with the film, that's for certain. Good point - you do get your money’s worth with the film, that’s for certain.

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by coffee http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-8 coffee Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:43:31 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-8 i haven't read the Watchmen comic series, but i can't imagine them packing any more into one movie even if they wanted to, which is good for me, makes me feel like i got my money's worth i haven’t read the Watchmen comic series, but i can’t imagine them packing any more into one movie even if they wanted to, which is good for me, makes me feel like i got my money’s worth

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by Craig Michael Patrick http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Craig Michael Patrick Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:48:13 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-7 Doing well, doing well. You? Personally, I don't believe Snyder's a hack. I feel his remake of <em>Dawn of the Dead</em> was better than the original - no small feat in my eyes. I enjoyed watching <em>300</em>, but it was malnourished in terms of storytelling, anorexic cinema, like watching two hours plus worth of oil paintings stacked behind a common theme. My concern was the vehicle for this story. Conversely, after having read <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>, I enjoyed the movies far more than the books. Kooky. Doing well, doing well. You?

Personally, I don’t believe Snyder’s a hack. I feel his remake of Dawn of the Dead was better than the original - no small feat in my eyes. I enjoyed watching 300, but it was malnourished in terms of storytelling, anorexic cinema, like watching two hours plus worth of oil paintings stacked behind a common theme.

My concern was the vehicle for this story. Conversely, after having read The Lord of the Rings, I enjoyed the movies far more than the books. Kooky.

]]> Comment on movie review: the watchmen by Amphigorey http://cmpatrick.com/2009/01/09/moviereview-thewatchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Amphigorey Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:17:24 +0000 http://cmpatrick.com/?p=1#comment-6 The big question is WHO watched the Watchmen? Watchmen, the movie, was like sex without love. I'm only bitter because I think Snyder is a hack. It's still the best money can buy, right? (I must say, I enjoyed reading Kubert's finest disecting this sacred cow. How's life? *g*) The big question is WHO watched the Watchmen?

Watchmen, the movie, was like sex without love.

I’m only bitter because I think Snyder is a hack.

It’s still the best money can buy, right?

(I must say, I enjoyed reading Kubert’s finest disecting this sacred cow. How’s life? *g*)

]]>